Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New openSAFETY dissector
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:01:33 +0100
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Anders Broman wrote:Unfortunatly there is no telling when it will be reviewed though - someone will have to find the time to do it.I've reviewed it - and already have a version with most of the suggestions from the review, which appears to work, although I don't know what the right thing to do is for the "unknown message type" issue. I'm waiting for Roland's comments on that....
I have commented that in the bug section. Basically there is no unknown message type, so if the dissector encounters such a type, it will fail the dissection, and the dissector will return false, allowing another dissector a run at the packet. I have updated the bug report with the newest version of the patch. kind regards, Roland ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 14)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Stig Bjørlykke (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Anders Broman (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Guy Harris (Mar 19)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 22)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 24)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Stig Bjørlykke (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 18)