Re: range in filters

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Mar 14, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:

> Has anyone ever looked into implementing range checks in display 
> filters?  For example, a typical Unix style traceroute would be in the 
> UDP port range 33434 to 33464, so I would like to do a filter such as 
> "udp.port range 33434 33464"

Or "udp.port range 33434-33464" or something such as that.  (libpcap's equivalent would be "udp portrange 33434-33464".)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe