Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage)
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 22:52:26 -0700
On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:
Attaching working PoC, listing all fields ordered by protocol takes some more time (1.07s vs 0.04s compiled with -O0), but output is the same.
What effect, if any, does it have on startup time? (Would it *reduce* startup time?) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 07)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Guy Harris (Jul 07)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 07)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Evan Huus (Jul 08)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) mmann78 (Jul 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 28)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Guy Harris (Jul 07)