Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage)
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:16:24 +0200
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 10:52:26PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:Attaching working PoC, listing all fields ordered by protocol takes some more time (1.07s vs 0.04s compiled with -O0), but output is the same.What effect, if any, does it have on startup time? (Would it *reduce* startup time?)
I don't see any difference. Ir numbers from callgrind tshark -G dunno: before after PROGRAM TOTALS 786,421,249 760,023,381 ... proto_register_field_array 282,673,087 256,598,790 3%? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 07)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Guy Harris (Jul 07)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 07)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Evan Huus (Jul 08)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) mmann78 (Jul 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 28)
- Re: RFC: Protocol fields list (reduce memory usage) Guy Harris (Jul 07)