Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On May 12, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net> wrote:

> Guy Harris skrev 2013-05-11 19:45:
> > On May 11, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Ambarisha B <b.ambarisha () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > > I was trying to move the reassembled data from the reassembled_table to frame_data.
>
> If the pointer to the reassembled data is  stored in the per_packet_data in frame_data the memory usage should work 
> out to be the same or a bit less as the reassembled hash table wouldn't be needed, right?

If it's stored as per-packet data, then it involves no change to the frame_data structure, so it doesn't involve 
increasing the size of that structure (which would involve adding 4 to 8 bytes for every packet).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe