Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

> That hadn't even occurred to me; I was thinking more of the fact that
> we don't have a separate 'head' structure for reassembly chains and
> just assume certain fields are set/unset based on whether the
> structure is first in the list or not.

I just made an attempt to clean that up.

In the process, I found at least one dissector that assumes that the head structure and the fragment structure look the 
same, and even some of the freeing code in reassemble.c assumes that.

I dropped the attempt in question for now.

A from-scratch rewrite might called for here.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe