Wireshark mailing list archives
Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format]
From: Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:18:26 +0200
Hi all, I would like to have the proto_tree_add_subtree and proto_tree_add_subtree_format functions backported to master-1.12. Any objects to that? It is only a new addition to the API, so it should be pretty safe. It should make backporting changes easier. (read: backport a refactoring (WIP) to reduce code duplication in the SSL and DTLS dissectors.) Kind regards, Peter https://lekensteyn.nl ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Peter Wu (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Pascal Quantin (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Bill Meier (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Guy Harris (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] mmann78 (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Peter Wu (Jul 11)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] mmann78 (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Pascal Quantin (Jul 10)