Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format]

[Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>]

Le 10 juil. 2014 23:19, "Peter Wu" <peter () lekensteyn nl> a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to have the proto_tree_add_subtree and
> proto_tree_add_subtree_format functions backported to master-1.12. Any
objects
> to that? It is only a new addition to the API, so it should be pretty
safe.
> It should make backporting changes easier. (read: backport a refactoring
(WIP)
> to reduce code duplication in the SSL and DTLS dissectors.)

IMHO we have already waited too long to freeze 1.12 content and while those
code refactoring are nice to have, they do not seem mandatory for the new
stable branch.
We should only apply bugfixes from now and publish a new RC followed
shortly by the final 1.12.0 release. If there are blocker bugs, we should
identify them ASAP.

Just my 2 cents,
Pascal.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe