Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT)
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:50:10 -0400
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
On 11 March 2014 20:35, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:Git commit ids differ between different people (each clone may create their one)Not technically true. If I make a commit with SHA x, push it, and it gets submitted, then it is true that the final SHA in master will be y != x. However, the next time I pull then I will get SHA y as well. They x and y technically reference different commits, since y contains additional information about who reviewed it, when it was submitted from Gerrit, etc.But aren't we talking about users, rather than devs? Users will either build from a clone from the main repo, or use an automated build, thus their reference point will be the Gerrit | master SHA whichever is the most appropriate name for it. In any case I don't think this fulfils the initial question. Previously we could say to users that an issue was fixed in svn r nnnn and they would "know" that any rev later than that was good. I don't understand how they can "know" that with a SHA of the latest master commit | merge.
SHAs aren't ordered like SVN revisions are (so given two arbitrary SHAs and nothing else I can't determine which came first) but they do still have an ordering in the repository. Regardless, we can say: fixed in commit SHA. They can pull, and if "git show SHA" shows the revision then they've got it. Otherwise they don't. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT, (continued)
- Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT Christopher Maynard (Mar 11)
- Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT Evan Huus (Mar 11)
- Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT Anders Broman (Mar 11)
- Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT Graham Bloice (Mar 11)
- Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT Christopher Maynard (Mar 11)
- GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Hadriel Kaplan (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Roland Knall (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Alexis La Goutte (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Evan Huus (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Graham Bloice (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Evan Huus (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Graham Bloice (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Evan Huus (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Graham Bloice (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Evan Huus (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Guy Harris (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Guy Harris (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Hadriel Kaplan (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Evan Huus (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT) Hadriel Kaplan (Mar 11)
- Re: GIT tutorials Gerald Combs (Mar 11)