Re: Undissected packet bytes

[Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>]

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

> I suppose you could add a an expert info, but I think that might be
> overkill, most users probably don't care that much.


Expert infos could be added under conditional compilation. If enabled it
would allow to filter packets that has expert info set, in order to find
out incomplete dissectors against a large set of data (eg. menagerie).


> You could just log
> it, or dissect it as data, or...

You mean using g_log, don't you? Where those logs go? I'm not able to show
them.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe