Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Undissected packet bytes


From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:23:55 +0100

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Michal Labedzki <michal.labedzki () tieto com>
wrote:

One more hint: if push patch as draft then add reviewer, because draft
is invisible for anyone (expect author and reviewers)

Alternative command(s) to send to gerrit:
git push origin HEAD:refs/drafts/master
git push origin HEAD:refs/publish/master


Thanks for the suggestion, I missed that.


By the way: I vote for adding expert info. Sometimes there are
undecoded fields with info like that "Undecoded if you want that ask
developers to add" :)


That was my idea, too. But I encountered some issues achieving that. I will
add you as reviewer too, maybe you can suggest me a feasible way to to
that. Anyone interested, please ask to be added.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: