Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: proto.h extension
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 17:53:21 -0400
On 05/08/15 15:09, Guy Harris wrote:
So should we think about localization of the packet summary and detail fields (which would, I suspect, be a huge project), and possibly leave the unit strings open for localization, or not?
I think Ulf's reasoning: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Translations for not translating Wireshark (beyond the UI stuff) is quite sound.So: no localization except for the UI stuff (like is being done today with the Qt GUI).
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- proto.h extension John Dill (May 07)
- Re: proto.h extension Christopher Maynard (May 07)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: proto.h extension John Dill (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension John Dill (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Evan Huus (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Jeff Morriss (May 08)
- Re: proto.h extension Alexis La Goutte (May 10)
- Re: proto.h extension Guy Harris (May 08)