Re: proto.h extension

[Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>]

+1 with Jeff about translation

About BASE_UNIT_STRING, it is really needed ? because there is description
field.. (to say the unit of field...)

About BASE_NO_BITMASK_DISPLAY, why not, there is some times for some field,
it is no easy to have a good display for bitmask field..

Regards,

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
wrote:

> On 05/08/15 15:09, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> > So should we think about localization of the packet summary and detail
> > fields (which would, I suspect, be a huge project), and possibly leave the
> > unit strings open for localization, or not?
>
> I think Ulf's reasoning:
>
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Translations
>
> for not translating Wireshark (beyond the UI stuff) is quite sound.
>
> So: no localization except for the UI stuff (like is being done today with
> the Qt GUI).
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe