Re: checklicenses.py

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Aug 6, 2016, at 1:21 PM, João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote:

> Done in https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16913/.

Does "Removed regex to check files without an extension." mean that we are, or aren't, checking files without an 
extension?

If it means we aren't, should we give the few scripts that don't have an extension an extension, such as .sh for shell 
scripts, so that we check them for a license?  Most of our shell scripts have a .sh extension, although that's not 
necessarily the right answer for shell scripts to be run as commands.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe