Re: checklicenses.py

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Aug 8, 2016, at 3:10 PM, João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote:

> Mainly what I was trying to say is that this dual licensing distinction can already be handled with path-specific 
> exceptions so I guess I'm indifferent to adding more code for this.

I view path-specific exceptions as workarounds for deficiencies in licensecheck, and would prefer to have as few 
path-specific exceptions as possible.  Ideally, the only places where path-specific exceptions would be used would be 
places where licensecheck would need AI rather than pattern matching to identify the license. :-)

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe