Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Multiple TRANSUM fixes


From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:53:39 +0100

Apart from broken ability, how should gerrit behave with multiple "Bug:"
tags? With one, once the change gets merged, it closes the bug on bugzilla.
But what happens with multiple tags when just one gets merged?
Just curious, if anyone knows...

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev <
wireshark-dev () wireshark org> wrote:

You need separate line for each bug, ie.

Bug: 12345
Bug: 12346
Bug: 12347

When you do that on the initial push, gerrit will mark the bugs.  If you
do it after the initial commit, the bugs will only be notified when patch
is submitted to master.
The ability for Gerrit to actually move bug to closed state has been
broken for awhile, so typically the core developer who submits the patch
ends up "manually" closing the bugs referenced in the commit message.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Mon, Nov 13, 2017 1:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Multiple TRANSUM fixes

Hi Richard, Yes that does sound best. You know when you enter the line:
Bug: 12345 into the commit comment, can I list the bugs? And if I do, will
gerrit update Bugzilla? I'm guessing not for all, so what the best way to
handle this? Thanks and regards...Paul -----Original Message----- From:
Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
<wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org?>] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe Sent:
13 November 2017 18:13 To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-
dev () wireshark org> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Multiple TRANSUM fixes On
Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com>
wrote: > Hi, > > > > I want to submit a patched packet-transum.c file. It
fixes three > bugs, none of which are currently on Bugzilla. Should I
submit three > bugs and then refer to all three bugs in the patch commit
comments? > Or can I specify all three bugs in one Bugzilla report? What’s
the correct form? I would say submit three separate bugs. This eases
management, because if later one of your fixes is found to be incomplete,
and you only filed one bug, it becomes confusing when we reopen that one
bug. -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe:
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
<wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe>
______________________________________________________________________
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. Any views or opinions expressed are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Advance Seven Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does
not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Advance Seven Ltd.
Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour House, Coopers
End Lane, Stansted, Essex CM24 1SJ ______________________________
________________________________________ This email has been scanned by
the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please
visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________
________________________________________ ______________________________
_____________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev
mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives:
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe:
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
<wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe>

____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: