Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:03:04 -0700

On Mar 14, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:

I plan on releasing 2.5.1 tomorrow and I've tentatively scheduled creating the 2.6 branch on April 2, followed by 
2.6.0 on April 18.

As discussed previously we'll drop support for Qt 4 and GTK+ in the master branch after master-2.6 is created. Unless 
there are strong objections I'd like to bump the minimum GLib version to 2.32.

Is there any reason to drop support for older versions of Qt 5 - which would mean dropping support for, at minimum, Mac 
OS X Snow Leopard?

I'd also like your opinion on doing the following:

Deprecating or removing Autotools. We'd need generate source tarballs using another method, e.g. 
tools/git-export-release.sh.

+0 (i.e., I wouldn't complain if we did, and I wouldn't complain if we didn't).

Shipping the Windows installers with Npcap.

(Presumably that's assuming we get whatever licensing deal is required.)

If the Npcap driver isn't too crashy, I'd vote +1 on that, given how far back WinPcap's version of libpcap goes.

Renaming protocols to match current reality, e.g. "bootp" to "dhcp" and "ssl" to "tls".

The latter makes sense; the former is a little weird, given that, technically, DHCP is a protocol that's implemented 
with BOOTP options, but if there's not much BOOTP-without-DHCP traffic now, it probably won't bother people that they 
need to type "dhcp" to refer to BOOTP.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: