Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Status label for issues


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal () wireshark org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:43:19 +0000 (UTC)

Hi Graham,

23 avr. 2021 16:39:16 Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>:

How will issues that aren't bugs be handled, e.g. enhancement requests?

We already have an enhancement label.

@Uli, LGTM.

Cheers,
Pascal.


On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 13:30, Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu> wrote:
Hi everyone,

For issues (especially bugs) I really miss the status field which was available with Bugzilla.

Therefore I would like to create these scoped labels [1]:

ws-status::unconfirmed => This bug has recently been added to the issue tracker. Nobody has confirmed that this bug 
is
valid.
ws-status::confirmed => This bug is valid.
ws-status::in-progress => This bug is not yet resolved, but is assigned to the proper person who is working on the 
bug.
ws-status::invalid => The problem described is not a bug or not our bug.
ws-status::wontfix => The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed.
ws-status::fixed => A fix for this bug is checked into master branch.
ws-status::duplicate => The problem is a duplicate of an existing issue.

Scoped labels are mutually exclusive.

Setting the label requires manual interaction. So yes, this label won't reflect the real state when the issue is 
closed
automatically (for example when a MR referencing this issue is merged or when the issue is marked as an duplicate).

Furthermore a normal user is not allowed to set labels at the moment. Having the label in the issue template won't 
add
the label when opening an issue.

Maybe we need another bot (like triage-ops [2]) to set labels automatically.
Does anyone have experience with triage-ops bot (or any other bot managing issues) and Gitlab and can share some 
insides?

Any objections? Comments are very welcome.

Cheers
Uli

[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/labels.html#workflows-with-scoped-labels
[2]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/triage-ops
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


--
Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: