Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Status label for issues
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:49:46 +0200
I somewhat feel a little bit more sceptical of increasing the numbers of labels. They would require discipline before being enforceable. Also, we would need some form of documentation to allow a lookup what each label is supposed to be and what eventual escalation procedures would be. I suggest we create a wiki page for that discussion first, and if we can figure that out create the labels. Also, I would limit the number of labels to as few as possible kind regards Roland Am Sa., 24. Apr. 2021 um 13:33 Uhr schrieb Jirka Novak <j.novak () netsystem cz
:
Hi Uli,For issues (especially bugs) I really miss the status field which wasavailable with Bugzilla.Therefore I would like to create these scoped labels [1]: ... Any objections? Comments are very welcome.I agree with you. I'm missing this information about created issues too. I propose one more kind of label/labels. It is more about interaction with reporter of the issue - "waiting for response". There are many issues opened for years where last message is request for sample or more information. I think that if such issue is opened for years with no reaction, it is useless and should be closed. Best regards, Jirka ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Jirka Novak (Apr 24)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Eugène Adell (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)