Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Status label for issues
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:28:47 -0700
On Apr 23, 2021, at 5:29 AM, Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu> wrote:
Therefore I would like to create these scoped labels [1]: ws-status::unconfirmed => This bug has recently been added to the issue tracker. Nobody has confirmed that this bug is valid. ws-status::confirmed => This bug is valid. ws-status::in-progress => This bug is not yet resolved, but is assigned to the proper person who is working on the bug. ws-status::invalid => The problem described is not a bug or not our bug. ws-status::wontfix => The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed. ws-status::fixed => A fix for this bug is checked into master branch. ws-status::duplicate => The problem is a duplicate of an existing issue.
The last of those is, well, a duplicate of the "(duplicated)" in the status box at the top (if the close is done right, by entering /duplicate #{bug number} into a comment and saving the comment). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Status label for issues, (continued)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Eugène Adell (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)