Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Status label for issues
From: Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:15:38 +0200
Am 24.04.21 um 13:31 schrieb Jirka Novak:
I propose one more kind of label/labels. It is more about interaction with reporter of the issue - "waiting for response". There are many issues opened for years where last message is request for sample or more information. I think that if such issue is opened for years with no reaction, it is useless and should be closed.
Yes, I fully agree. Great idea. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Status label for issues, (continued)
- Re: Status label for issues Jirka Novak (Apr 24)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Eugène Adell (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Jirka Novak (Apr 24)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)