Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Status label for issues


From: Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:27:16 +0200

I see your point.

We had this status field at Bugzilla and it worked sufficiently well (at least for dissector bugs).

At the moment it is very hard to see if someone has already had a look at an issue, if she/he was able to reproduce it,
if a sample capture is missing etc.

Regarding additional tooling I will have a closer look at triage-ops the next days.


Am 27.04.21 um 09:06 schrieb Roland Knall:

I have especially an issue with the new ws-status labels and their transitions. Judging from a company, where we have
about 50 developers whose daily bread it is to transition properly in Jira, I cannot see an open-source project with 
no
additional tooling to properly transition between e.g. unconfirmed => confirmed => in-progress.

That is my main concern. 
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: