Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Status label for issues
From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:48:26 +0100
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 15:43, Pascal Quantin <pascal () wireshark org> wrote:
Hi Graham, 23 avr. 2021 16:39:16 Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>:How will issues that aren't bugs be handled, e.g. enhancement requests?We already have an enhancement label.
Ah, I thought this was some different label, sorry for the noise.
@Uli, LGTM. Cheers, Pascal.On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 13:30, Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu> wrote:Hi everyone, For issues (especially bugs) I really miss the status field which wasavailable with Bugzilla.Therefore I would like to create these scoped labels [1]: ws-status::unconfirmed => This bug has recently been added to the issuetracker. Nobody has confirmed that this bug isvalid. ws-status::confirmed => This bug is valid. ws-status::in-progress => This bug is not yet resolved, but is assignedto the proper person who is working on the bug.ws-status::invalid => The problem described is not a bug or not our bug. ws-status::wontfix => The problem described is a bug which will neverbe fixed.ws-status::fixed => A fix for this bug is checked into master branch. ws-status::duplicate => The problem is a duplicate of an existing issue. Scoped labels are mutually exclusive. Setting the label requires manual interaction. So yes, this label won'treflect the real state when the issue is closedautomatically (for example when a MR referencing this issue is mergedor when the issue is marked as an duplicate).Furthermore a normal user is not allowed to set labels at the moment.Having the label in the issue template won't addthe label when opening an issue. Maybe we need another bot (like triage-ops [2]) to set labelsautomatically.Does anyone have experience with triage-ops bot (or any other botmanaging issues) and Gitlab and can share some insides?Any objections? Comments are very welcome. Cheers Uli [1]:https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/labels.html#workflows-with-scoped-labels[2]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/triage-ops___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe-- Graham Bloice
-- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Jirka Novak (Apr 24)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Eugène Adell (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)