funsec mailing list archives
Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno?
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:55:12 -0500
On 2/24/06, Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:15:50 CST, RLVaughn said:"We also showed theoretically how to obtain the answer without ever running the algorithm, by using a 'chained Zeno' effect."It's shit like this that gets you '42' as an answer....The quantum counterfactual is one of the most weird aspect of the whole theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_definiteness
It seems to me that Heisenberg is assuming that we will always use invasive technology to measure particle movement and velocity, but if we develop a passive way of measuring the momentum and positions, then wouldnt we be able to know both at the same time? -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Duh - Chaining Zeno? RLVaughn (Feb 23)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Barrie Dempster (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Drsolly (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Drsolly (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? der Mouse (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? der Mouse (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)