funsec mailing list archives

Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno?


From: der Mouse <mouse () rodents montreal qc ca>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:07:04 -0500 (EST)

It seems to me that Heisenberg is assuming that we will always use
invasive technology to measure particle movement and velocity,

I think it's more like, Heisenberg was stating that there is no other
way to measure.

That is, I interpret the Uncertainty Principle as saying that it is not
possible to measure one value of a pair without correspondingly
disrupting its paired value.

but if we develop a passive way of measuring the momentum and
positions, then wouldnt we be able to know both at the same time?

Yes.  If we were to find such a way, it would be about the strongest
possible evidence that the Uncertainty Principle is wrong.

/~\ The ASCII                           der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML               mouse () rodents montreal qc ca
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: