funsec mailing list archives
Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:59:54 -0700
Toralv_Dirro () mcafee com wrote:
I do argue against the validity of the test method. You writing a virus to test just shows how effective AV is against this new virus and the particular way you build it.
Yes, that was what I was proposing to test. I claim that creating a new virus is a valid test of that.
I'm also saying I absolutely don't like new viruses to be created.
I don't think anyone is claiming otherwise. ;) BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses, (continued)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Dude VanWinkle (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 17)
- RE: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses David Harley (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 19)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 19)
- RE: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 21)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Dude VanWinkle (Aug 21)