funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID
From: "David Lodge" <dave () cirt net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:47:10 -0000
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:01:20 -0000, Dennis Henderson <hendomatic () gmail com> wrote:
Well after you're all done awarding each other honorary degrees, it would be good to hear about a solution, not just lament the issues..
*sigh* did you actually read my email? I mentioned a solution in the second paragraph. The problem is that governments seem to believe an ID card will stop terrorism, stop fraud, stop illegal immigration, stop underage drinking/smoking/sex, cure aids, make cold fusion work and cause world peace. They won't do any of the above, in fact, with some (e.g. fraud) they have the potential to make them worse. So, there's several solutions: 1. Introduce an ID card, watch lots of commercial companies abuse it; watch lots of government employees abuse it; because the back end will be made to a tight deadline by the cheapest bidder, watch hackers and culture jammers abuse it; watch the secret services abuse it; watch the whole relationship 'twixt state and citizen change around. 2. Don't bother, carry on with the current system, though flawed is working. 3. Use an independently secured, openly verified with key (i.e. public) auditability of design backend to allow the distribution of identification tickets for the required service. 4. Move away from the ID culture, only require ID for essential services. To solve it properly you need a combination of 4 and 3. In some cases, e.g. opening a bank account, ID shouldn't be required (the money laundering excuse is a load of bollocks) so we chose 4. In others, e.g. buying restricted items, a token part of identification is required (hence not all items should be viewed), so we chose 3. In simple terms an ID solution needs to be designed according to current and future need, following the principles of privacy (for the citizen) and security (e.g. least amount of information presented, high auditability, open design) and quality (not to the lowest bidder). This is not what the UK or US governments are doing - they're starting from a position of "we'd like an ID card and a national database of all our citizens" and then trying to justify it, design it, then look at the requirement. dave _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law, (continued)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Dude Van Winkle (Dec 14)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Drsolly (Dec 15)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Dennis Henderson (Dec 15)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Drsolly (Dec 15)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Brian Loe (Dec 15)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Drsolly (Dec 15)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law Dude Van Winkle (Dec 14)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Card Law David Lodge (Dec 16)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Dr. Neal Krawetz (Dec 17)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Dennis Henderson (Dec 18)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Dr. Neal Krawetz (Dec 18)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Dennis Henderson (Dec 19)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID David Lodge (Dec 19)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Dennis Henderson (Dec 19)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Dude Van Winkle (Dec 19)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Senators Propose Repeal of National ID Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 20)