Re: ruling: liability for providers who don't act on clients' illegal activities?

[Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Rob Thompson<my.security.lists () gmail com>
wrote:

> Now if the hosting site is hosting (as in advertising, come here to host
> your illegal warez for $$$) to cater to the criminal, that's another
> story.  But that isn't how I am interpreting this.  I am interpreting
> this as sheer laziness and quite frankly it's rather pathetic.  Passing
> the buck isn't okay.  We count on the schools to raise our kids and the
> ISP to police the interwebs.  Bullshit!

Have you ever heard of criminal negligence?

I suppose you think that's bullshit, too?

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFKpfxAq1pz9mNUZTMRAkT9AKCXZyYBczOmhDxPoFopeMSavVNB/ACeOiZG
RE3nJN0G5yK6SayMrb8IqUk=
=zvQp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.