Re: ruling: liability for providers who don't act on clients' illegal activities?

[Rob Thompson <my.security.lists () gmail com>]

Best I can say is this...from my last reply.  And this is the last I'll
say.  I can see my opinion is far from popular.

If they were selling Anthrax, I wouldn't have said a word.  _THAT_ is
different.

Freaking handbags!!!


Paul Ferguson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Rob Thompson<my.security.lists () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > Now if the hosting site is hosting (as in advertising, come here to host
> > your illegal warez for $$$) to cater to the criminal, that's another
> > story.  But that isn't how I am interpreting this.  I am interpreting
> > this as sheer laziness and quite frankly it's rather pathetic.  Passing
> > the buck isn't okay.  We count on the schools to raise our kids and the
> > ISP to police the interwebs.  Bullshit!
>
>
> Have you ever heard of criminal negligence?
>
> I suppose you think that's bullshit, too?
>
> - ferg

-- 
Rob

+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
|                         _   |
|  ASCII ribbon campaign ( )  |
|   - against HTML email  X   |
|                        / \  |
|                             |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.