nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Dave Siegel <dsiegel () net99 net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 12:28:00 -0700 (MST)
And Paul Traina wrote something vaguely similar. I think you guys are both missing what I think was Jon's original point: Routers forward packets faster than PCs, but the forwarding function and the routing protocol function do not have to reside on the same box. You can add a PC (workstation, whatever) which runs the routing protocol and stuffs routes into the router. It doesn't have to support the link-layer du jour. Ethernet will do the job just fine. As I recall the original discussion was of colocating a router, to forward packets, with a workstation, to compute routes.
So what would the normal implementation of such a design be? ebgp-multihop all of your peers into the PC, and then a single peering session the Cisco, presuming no "next-hop-self" routes? I can see some amount of value in such a design, if it could be made to work correctly. Does anybody have the spare equipment to build a lab? (pfeh, yeah, right) Dave -- Dave Siegel Director of Engineering, Net99 http://www.webcity.com/ (602)249-1083 24x7 NOC line http://www.rtd.com/~dsiegel/ (520)318-0696 My Tucson Office
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jon Zeeff (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul Traina (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ peter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)