nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 14:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Paul, Does that mean that all the internet registries no longer allocate /24 (or longer) prefixes that have nothing to do with the actual Internet topology (these prefixes aka "portable addresses") ? Perhaps folks from various Internet registries would be able to answer this question.
Immaterial. What matters is if providers continue to route them.
CIDR works as long as addresses are assigned in a topologically significant fashion. And this precondition is crucial.
Not quite. CIDR works. Routing remains stable when providers route prefixes in a topological fashion.
Yakov.
-- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Curtis Villamizar (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: CIDR FAQ Eliot Lear (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Arnold Nipper (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jon Zeeff (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul Traina (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ peter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 15)