nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 95 05:47:43 PDT
Peter,
BTW - I have not studied the RFC's - so what will IPv6 do for us in the contect of routeing aggregation and latger boxes etc ?
Couple of observations: 1. The ability to aggregate routing information depends on how addresses are assigned, but does not depend on whether addresses are 32 bits wide or 128 bits wide. 2. IPv6 address allocation architecture (see draft-ietf-ipngwg-unicst-addr-allo-01.txt) is the same as IPv4. (just so that folks who read this note would have no doubts, the IPv6 Address Allocation Architecture document was written by Tony Li and myself - the same people who wrote the CIDR Address Allocation Architecture document). Conclusion: In the area of routing aggregation IPv6 will do for us *exactly the same* as what IPv4 does. Yakov.
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: CIDR FAQ Eliot Lear (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Arnold Nipper (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jon Zeeff (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul Traina (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ peter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nicolas Williams (Aug 15)