nanog mailing list archives
Re: botted hosts
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:44:45 +0300
Peter Corlett wrote:
Set up a website where one can input a route and can see hosts covered with it?A side-effect of the greylisting and other mail checks is that I've got a lovely list of compromised hosts. Is there any way I can usefully share these with the community?
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: botted hosts, (continued)
- Re: botted hosts Simon Waters (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 05)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Peter Corlett (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Peter Corlett (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- RE: botted hosts Ejay Hire (Apr 07)
- Re: botted hosts Sean Donelan (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: botted hosts Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)
- Re: botted hosts Paul Vixie (Apr 04)
- so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] J.D. Falk (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)