nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
From: "Andrew - Supernews" <andrew () supernews net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:30:15 +0000
"Paul" == Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com> writes:
Paul> well, in sbc-dsl-land, port 25 and port 587 are blocked, but Paul> port 26 gets through. I have a port-587 relay on my network which is used by some sbc-dsl-land users... they don't appear to be blocked -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com
Current thread:
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?, (continued)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Eric A. Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Frank Louwers (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Nils Ketelsen (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Joe Maimon (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Eric A. Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Nils Ketelsen (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- RE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? andrew2 (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Andrew - Supernews (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Robert L Mathews (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Jim Popovitch (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Bob Martin (Feb 15)