nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
From: Robert L Mathews <lists () tigertech com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:24:00 -0800
Paul Vixie wrote:
well, in sbc-dsl-land, port 25 and port 587 are blocked, but port 26 gets through. it seems bizarre that port 587 would ever be blocked
I suspect that was some kind of temporary aberration. SBC started blocking port 25 in the last two months, and during that time I've helped at least a dozen of our customers using SBC DSL switch their mail program settings from port 25 to port 587, with no trouble -- it worked in every case.
I bet it works if you try it again now (as you say, blocking port 587 makes no sense).
-- Robert L Mathews
Current thread:
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?, (continued)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Frank Louwers (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Nils Ketelsen (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Joe Maimon (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Eric A. Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Nils Ketelsen (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- RE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? andrew2 (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Andrew - Supernews (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Robert L Mathews (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Jim Popovitch (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Bob Martin (Feb 15)