nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:19:20 +0300
C. Jon Larsen wrote:
It was supposed to be a complete ground up re-write in an OO language and it would have the ability to link new modules or shared objects in at run time, and it would unify the existing router (25xx / 4[57]xx / 75xx) family with the Grand Junction acquisition - the CAT5K switch family into one code tree and one IOS to run them all.
CatOS and cat5k came from Crescendo acquisition. Pete
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry, (continued)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Daniel Golding (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Florian Weimer (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry J. Oquendo (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Dan Hollis (Jul 29)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jim McBurnett (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry C. Jon Larsen (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Hyunseog Ryu (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Petri Helenius (Jul 31)