nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Hey, Dan... What's that they say abou 800 lb. Gorillas... :-) - ferg -- Daniel Golding <dgolding () burtongroup com> wrote: Cisco's conduct in this case may or may not be improper - we'll have to wait for a little more information. From a PR point of view, they probably should have let things ride and allowed the Blackhat talk to occur. They look like bullies now, which is never good. Hindsight is 20/20, though. That being said, their policy of offering free updates for certain bug fixes to those who don't pay them for support is generous. See that hand feeding you? Don't bite it.
what about cisco's policy of sabotaging ebay sales and harassing used equipment resellers? the food that hand is feeding you is loaded with rat poison. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry, (continued)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 31)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher X. Candreva (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Daniel Golding (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Dan Hollis (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry C. Jon Larsen (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Hyunseog Ryu (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Petri Helenius (Jul 31)