nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:07:46 GMT
Hey, Dan... What's that they say abou 800 lb. Gorillas... :-) - ferg -- Daniel Golding <dgolding () burtongroup com> wrote: Cisco's conduct in this case may or may not be improper - we'll have to wait for a little more information. From a PR point of view, they probably should have let things ride and allowed the Blackhat talk to occur. They look like bullies now, which is never good. Hindsight is 20/20, though. That being said, their policy of offering free updates for certain bug fixes to those who don't pay them for support is generous. See that hand feeding you? Don't bite it. -- Daniel Golding -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry, (continued)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Tony Li (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Geo. (Jul 31)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher X. Candreva (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Daniel Golding (Jul 28)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Dan Hollis (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Ivan Groenewald (Jul 30)
- RE: Cisco and the tobacco industry C. Jon Larsen (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Hyunseog Ryu (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco and the tobacco industry Petri Helenius (Jul 31)