nanog mailing list archives

Re: Slaving the root and other top-level DNS zones


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:27:32 -0500

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:14:48 +0800, Phil Regnauld said:

    Point 2:

        I've heard that 98% of traffic to the root is junk, but since
        NXDOMAINs get quickly neg cached, how much bandwidth conservation
        and resource preservation are we talking about ?  If one takes
        AS112 into account, how much improvement is this ?

If that's the CAIDA paper I'm thinking of, a lot of the 98% junk was the sort
of stuff you'd expect from broken sites who probably won't do neg caching
right - and in fact, a significant portion (30%?) was *specifically* sources
that failed to negative cache a reply and asking over and over again, often
multiple times a second.

Of course, those sort of broken sites probably will manage to screw up
deploying a local hints file, resulting in *more* traffic at the roots :)

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: