nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:53:40 -0400
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:21:27 +0800, "Nathanael C. Cariaga" said:
Thanks for the prompt response. Actually our requirement is to find a webhosting provider whose routes are widely advertised locally and regionally.
That's different from who the provider peers with. We (AS1312) don't peer with much of anybody, but I *hope* our routes are pretty widely advertised. Anybody *not* seeing routes for AS1312? (And yes, most of the routes end up going through one or another of MATP's PoP's). So what failure mode are you trying to protect against by finding a provider with a lot of routes? I suspect there's probably a better metric to deal with the actual concern...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 18)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Thilo Bangert (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Randy Bush (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes bmanning (Oct 19)