tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: Speed specific Link-Layer Header Types for USB 2.0


From: Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:52:54 -0700

--- Begin Message --- From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:52:54 -0700
On May 9, 2022, at 12:40 PM, Tomasz Moń <desowin () gmail com> wrote:

On Mon, 2022-05-09 at 12:02 -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
On May 9, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Tomasz Moń <desowin () gmail com> wrote:

That would require defining pseudoheader that would have to be
included in every packet.

Is that really a great burden?

I think it would make it harder to understand the protocol for
newcomers that use tools like Wireshark to try to make sense of USB.

In what fashion would it do so?

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Current thread: