WebApp Sec mailing list archives
RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing
From: "Lyal Collins" <lyal.collins () key2it com au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:14:52 +1100
So, because the clients computer can be broken into, don't deploy a solution that can prevent phishing?
I'd add " ... that may prevent phishing unless the solution takes this and all other realistic scenarios/threat vectors into account in order to be effective for 2-5 years." The capital investment needed for these these sorts of solutions often means they have to be paid over over long periods. A solution that's 'junk' within weeks or a few months of launch is a massively career limiting move (MCLM) in my view. Lyal
-- Michael
Current thread:
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Evans, Arian (Jan 19)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 27)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 27)