WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing
From: Michael Silk <michaelsilk () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:35:15 -0800
Lyal said: On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:14:52 +1100, Lyal Collins <lyal.collins () key2it com au> wrote:
So, because the clients computer can be broken into, don't deploy a solution that can prevent phishing?I'd add " ... that may prevent phishing unless the solution takes this and all other realistic scenarios/threat vectors into account in order to be effective for 2-5 years."
So, re-worded it would be: "imho its pointless to deploy something [...] that doesn't work." ...
A solution that's 'junk' within weeks or a few months of launch is a massively career limiting move (MCLM) in my view.
Who's disagreeing with you ? Anyway, I'll leave it there. -- Michael
Current thread:
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing, (continued)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 23)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 27)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 27)