WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing
From: Michael Silk <michaelsilk () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:37:26 +1100
Lyal said:
Phishing and fraud are synomymous is this thread, imho.
No they are not. Thats the whole purpose of having these terms - to be able to differentiate threats and handle them individually.
Client side certificates are useless against fraud - imho its pointless to deploy something against one problem while knowing that there are already successful attacks against the so-called 'solution'.
So, because the clients computer can be broken into, don't deploy a solution that can prevent phishing? -- Michael
Current thread:
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Evans, Arian (Jan 19)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 24)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 24)
- RE: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Lyal Collins (Jan 27)
- Re: (secure email) Proposal to anti-phishing Michael Silk (Jan 27)