Re: Feds after Google data

[Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 1/20/06, David Lodge <dave () cirt net> wrote:
> There's an easy solution to all this. If you want your children to live in
> a cotton wool world where they can't see anything that would allegedly
> "damage" then. Then ban the children. Then they can pretend to be over 18
> at the newsagent and buy nudie mags like I used to.

Not only am I on my 5th vasectomy, but I already donated all my
children to stem cell research (much to the relief of funsec'ers). No
chance of a little dude running around seeing the massive evil that is
the human body unclothed.

I just think the .kids would be a good compromise for parents who want
to hide their children from such things.

Of course, in a perfect world, we should just tell em to STFU and
teach their kids manners, but these guys have _lots_ of power, so a
compromise is needed (for now)

-JP
"What a man, a woman, two midgets, and a donkey do behind closed doors
is no one elses business"
-Dave Attell (the comedian, not the IT Dave)

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.