funsec mailing list archives
Re: Can someone exlpain this to me?
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:04:27 -0500
On 2/18/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu> wrote:
--On February 18, 2006 1:16:40 PM -0500 Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:The one big difference, of course, is that our loonies aren't chopping people's heads off and blowing up women and babies.Uh, catholic priests rape thier altar boys, Cheney shoots lawyers at will, etc, etc, etc.And those are equivalent to murder? Maybe in your world but not in mine.
Its really interesting how you only responded to the parts of my email that you can rationalize. This was the joke email, its predecessor is the one in which I listed murderers of children and women. I am guessing this is a defence mechanism. Now you may respond with "Peterson was not a zealot". Maybe not a religious one, but for love of money, his zealotry was obscene.
You claim of the poor, etc. is a tired canard that has been disproven conclusively.
Again its interesting how you fixate on the part of the subject you have already rationalized. That of course being the word "poor" from my earlier statement. I wonder why you didnt think poor meant either; in bad health, loss of loved ones, or even go to the other word in my reasoning: unhappiness. Now I could make assumptions as to what this says about your character, what with focusing on cash and ignoring all human elements or emotional ones, but I am trying to clean up my act :-). I will instead ask that, when debating someone, try and give a little leeway in reading your opponents statements. Dont look at the "letter of the law", trying to find one idea that you can use to shred your opponent to bits, discarding the rest as "nothing you can work with". Rather try to look at the "spirit of the law" or what I am actually writing and trying to convey. In order to do this, you must read the _entire_ sentence before coming up with a way to refute it. Thanks again for the wonderful discourse, -JP "I offer a fabulous service to rich people, I tell them its OK to be rich. I can be _very_ convincing" -Prostitute with a masters in socio-economics from So Long And Thanks For All The Fish _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me?, (continued)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Kevin McAleavey (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Paul Schmehl (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Paul Schmehl (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Paul Schmehl (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Paul Schmehl (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Paul Schmehl (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Paul Schmehl (Feb 18)
- Thread killed, please refrain from replying further [was: Can someone exlpain this to me?] Gadi Evron (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Jon O. (Feb 17)
- Re: Can someone exlpain this to me? Ahmad Elkhatib (Feb 18)