funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone
From: "Lindsey, Ben J" <ben.lindsey () centerpointenergy com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:57:21 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I gotta ask a quick (ok, long) question for you folks, there is just something I guess I don't quite get. Please don't think I'm being adversarial - I'm just confused, perhaps even ignorant. Here goes: When it comes to tapping international phone calls that the "government" (whoever that may be) feels are made to/from possible terrorists, I have to admit this doesn't particularly bother me. I consider that it's a time of war and if it ever puts me out in some manner, it's the least I can do. Domestic calls are a slightly different ball of wax to me. On the one hand I have no problem with my phone records (who I called and who called me) being sent to the government. As a former ELINT/SIGINT specialist, I understand the wealth of information which can be gleaned from this once you have identified a particular bad guy/terrorist via some other means. (international calls to UBL for instance:)) So many times we wished we had known the endpoints of traffic we handled, and God knows what we missed because of it. But I also have to add that this is really only acceptable to me during wartime or when there are perhaps grave national security concerns. However, unless I am talking to a suspected terrorist, I cannot accept for any reason the monitoring of my domestic telephone calls without warrant. Sure, I don't care who knows what number I dialed -- but what was said during the call was personal and private. I know how many people have access to the phone record data already, so I'm not particularly bothered if the NSA (or other appropriate agency) wants it for their database. The views expressed (in general) on these matters in the list seem (to me) to indicate that nothing of the above is acceptable at any time without the standard warrant process -- whether there is previous precedent for it or not. Things much worse (in the eavesdropping vein) have taken place during (and outside of) national emergencies in the past, but there seemed to be no media talking it up (or complaints) until this current action. Further: If you are in the US, but not a citizen (or diplomat of some kind) -- should I care if the NSA listens to *every* word you say on the phone? Am I misreading everyone (because really its not just this list, I am not pointing fingers -- again, just seeking clarity about the issue and views surrounding it) -- or am I in a state of misunderstanding about what is (or perhaps the depth of what is) going on? Thanks, - -b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.6 (Build 6060) iQA/AwUBRI2O2xccr+NAdBIpEQKERACgxfduDtR3jxIfUnfJwL1rHBmf/I4An1mD mOnZ4NZTUgATfC7WxUo/rnFy =Zac4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Lindsey, Ben J (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Drsolly (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)