funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone
From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:30:30 -0500
On 6/12/06, coderman <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
On 6/12/06, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:... The odds are slim to the point of these searches being, at best, a waste of time. At worst, naturally, they may be a distraction from the stereotypical guy wearing big shoes. If they hold to an "unbiased", every fourth passenger (or whatever)...but you see what would happen if "they" decided that children under 12 or frail elderly over 80 were not to be searched, right? the drug mules are an interesting view into this situation (i can dig up a paper if you're interested)
Drugs and bombs are apples and oranges.
likewise, the 'SSSS' designation is fairly pointless since the bad guy knows not to attempt to board if he gets one stamped on his ticket.
Agreed.
i don't know what the right solution is, but it's not a free pass for children and the elderly (this would be abused) nor is it the 'SSSS' based searches.
What free pass? They still have to go through the metal detectors and their luggage is still searched!
armed pilots behind reinforced cockpits and air marshals at least provide some degree of actual protection.
Yeah, 1 in how many flights is there a martial? And have you read up on the armed pilot program? Unless something has changed that I haven't heard about, its a bitch to get in and even if you pass the course your airline might still prevent you from carrying.
did you have to or did they tell you it was required? it's my understanding that you still do not have to show ID to fly, though this will get you the third degree search and you can expect them to pressure you for ID and possibly even tell you it is required. you don't _have_ to, though :)
They stated it was required (and I'm not going to subject my daughter to any more reality than I have to). I know of what you speak - in the circles I used to run it was often discussed, as was being asked for your "papers" at a NARC stop, etc.. However, a lot of these rules/laws have changed since 9/11 and I'm not too sure it isn't *required* now. _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Lindsey, Ben J (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Drsolly (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone coderman (Jun 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Henderson, Dennis K. (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Drsolly (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Brian Loe (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone der Mouse (Jun 24)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Drsolly (Jun 12)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Lindsey, Ben J (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] U.S. Government to Ask Courts to Toss Phone Fergie (Jun 24)