funsec mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:16:48 -0400
On 9/18/06, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> wrote:
Drsolly wrote: > Yes, that's a drawback. But if a corporation breaks the law, surely at > least one of the corporate officers has broken the law? In the US at least, generally no. There's a very good documentary explaining all the legal maneuverings and their (generally rather distasteful) implications I recommend you get from your local video/DVD store called, simply "The Corporation". You can learn a little about it at its official website: http://www.thecorporation.com/
Hmm, something make me think that these people have a call to undefined function mysql_connect() in D:\inetpub\wwwroot\thecorporation.com\site\0.php on line 138 Just a hunch ;-) -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?, (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Drsolly (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Blue Boar (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Blue Boar (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 19)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Nick FitzGerald (Sep 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court? Dude VanWinkle (Sep 18)