Re: Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:30:11 EDT, Dude VanWinkle said:

> Getting back to the thread though: Vixie said:
>
>
> "last but not least, i want steve linford to be welcome at NANOG and IETF
> meetings held in the US (and even those held in indiana, if ever.)  having
> him taken from the airport in handcuffs would be a real buzz-killer for me."
>
> Is that a possibility? Did Spamhaus break the law by not being in the
> courts jurisdiction?

Adobe.  ROT-13. Skylarov. DMCA.

And in a totally unrelated case several years ago, Alan Cox intentionally
left a changelog entry out of a Linux kernel release, because supplying the
usual level of explanitory detail would quite likely have exposed him to
a similar DMCA issue if he ever left Swansea and came to the US.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.